|
Thank you for this award. Especially to Marilyn Schoeman Dow who I’ve heard put you up to this. I spend my days giving commendations, not getting them. And it’s particularly startling to be commended for something that has annoyed the hell out of the people in my life who had other ideas about what I should be doing.
Creativity—AKA making it up as you go along—you know people who think that’s too odd to be tolerated. It’s got to be stamped out. It’s great to be in an assemblage of people who want more of it.
Making it up for me included making up a job I was willing—even delighted—to do, after years of trying to fit into slots created by others. It was always a lousy fit. Mainly because employee creativity was not exactly high on my employers’ agendas.
I worked for a few small outfits like the US Maritime Administration, the State Department, USIA, AT&T, and IBM. I usually managed to get myself into a little subset Tom Peters would have called a skunkworks, and Gifford Pinchot would describe as “intrapreneurs.” Whatever name you choose, it’s where the oddballs cluster and work, under the radar of anti-creativity forces.
At AT&T, I was on a small team that was making films for the company. Their Basking Ridge studio was state-of-the-art, a technically exciting place. I was in that studio in 1982 when word blasted through to set up a closed-circuit broadcast from Washington DC for an announcement by the CEO, Charlie Brown. His face came on the monitors, describing the deal he had just signed to break up Ma Bell.
It looked to me like he had pulled off the coup of the century, offloading parts of the company that were stagnant and holding those that were the most promising and profitable. This rocking-chair company was suddenly a rocket ship. Or to use Michael Beyerlein’s great image from earlier today, the massive, lumbering tanker was breaking up into a fleet of speedboats.
But looking around me, I saw my exuberant reaction to this prospect was not shared. I saw tears. I saw ashen faces. Creativity, making new things up—manning rockets or piloting speedboats—was not what people there had signed on for. They wanted good old predictable, invariable Ma Bell.
A few decades of such experiences of no creativity @ work, helped convince me that I was going to have to make up my own work world.
Creating the Giraffe Heroes Project gave me the chance at a day job that fully uses my ideas on how people and operations should be managed, my personal skills, and my deep concerns for the health of the body politic.
I seem to have created a game others want to play. The Project has consistently attracted such marvelous people, it’s a pleasure to get up in the morning and head for the office.
Next week a faculty member at Davidson College in NC is flying across country to volunteer in our office for a month. One of her email messages said, “I’ve read your whole web site and your work is absolutely creative and subversive. I can’t wait to get there and help.”
She got that right. And I’m wondering how often creativity is indeed subversive.
The Giraffe Heroes Project works across a broad spectrum of ages, from preschoolers who listen to the adventures of our mascots Stan Tall & Bea Tall, to adults who come to our website and our workshops. To all of them we deliver the subversive message that they can make it up, that their concerns matter, that their actions matter, that they can invent their own responses to life’s challenges.
We offer all of them the stories of Giraffe Heroes, people who are living their lives creatively, bravely, compassionately, changing things that need to be changed, making it up as they go along.
In classrooms, we then say, “Go see who you can find who’s living this way and come back to tell the class those stories.” When the kids are full of these exemplars of meaningful lives, they’re ready and eager to move into concerned action themselves, doing real things in the real world that make a difference, and we show them how do do that successfully.
I believe that the kids who’ve had the experience of making up service projects and seeing them have an impact won’t settle for life as consumers. They’ll be citizens.
That should be a goal of public education in a democracy—to foster caring, involved citizens.
We want people who can bring skills, curiosity, integrity and creativity to the American workplace because our country desperately needs creativity for our economy, and strong citizens for our republic.
Giraffe materials work on that citizenship part and it’s appalling that we’re subversive—for doing what ought to be the work of public education. But citizenship and creativity are not being instilled into kids in the system.
The more I work with our schools, infiltrating the system with Giraffe materials, the more I think we’re lucky if there’s an iota of creativity left in any of us.
I speak from unfortunate experience. I was one of the “good” kids, jumping through all the hoops, but with this underlying mutter of back talk—
“Are you serious?”
“What if we did it this way?”
“There’s a bigger picture here and the tiny peek you’re taking at it is just too small. There’s a link to that material over there, in another class, maybe even to things happening outside the school, in the real world.”
“How come you think it’s great that I get As on tests when I know I don’t remember a word of the material—and it doesn’t seem to matter that I don’t?” “Why do you keep filling up my time with busy work when I’d rather be reading everything I can get my hands on?”
I was still thinking—and muttering—that way when I showed up for work—such an annoying young person.
But I wasn’t wrong. I have as my witness many wise people who have studied our system of compulsory education and reported that it’s an appallingly effective stifler of creativity. top
|